Summary
Marx explores how capitalist production truly begins when many workers labor together under one boss, not when they work alone. He shows that cooperation - people working together - creates a special kind of power. When twelve people work as a team for twelve hours, they accomplish far more than twelve individuals working separately for the same time. This happens for several reasons: workers can share tools and workspace more efficiently, they can tackle time-sensitive jobs that require many hands, they motivate each other through friendly competition, and they can specialize in different parts of the same task. Marx uses vivid examples - from masons passing stones up a ladder to ancient civilizations building pyramids - to show cooperation's transformative power. However, under capitalism, this cooperation belongs entirely to the boss, not the workers. The capitalist pays for individual labor but gets the bonus power of teamwork for free. Workers enter the workplace as separate individuals selling their personal labor, but once inside, they become part of the capitalist's organized machine. The boss must coordinate this cooperation, which requires managers and supervisors - creating a hierarchy that serves capital's need to extract maximum value. Marx distinguishes this from earlier forms of cooperation based on shared ownership or slavery, arguing that capitalist cooperation appears natural but actually represents a specific historical arrangement that concentrates the benefits of collective work in private hands.
Coming Up in Chapter 14
Having shown how cooperation amplifies labor's power, Marx next examines how capitalists organize this cooperation through the division of labor and manufacturing - breaking complex work into specialized parts that transform both the production process and the workers themselves.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
CO-OPERATION Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I - Chapter Thirteen Karl Marx. Capital Volume One Chapter Thirteen: Co-operation Capitalist production only then really begins, as we have already seen, when each individual capital employs simultaneously a comparatively large number of labourers; when consequently the labour-process is carried on on an extensive scale and yields, relatively, large quantities of products. A greater number of labourers working together, at the same time, in one place (or, if you will, in the same field of labour), in order to produce the same sort of commodity under the mastership of one capitalist, constitutes, both historically and logically, the starting-point of capitalist production. With regard to the mode of production itself, manufacture, in its strict meaning, is hardly to be distinguished, in its earliest stages, from the handicraft trades of the guilds, otherwise than by the greater number of workmen simultaneously employed by one and the same individual capital. The workshop of the medieval master handicraftsman is simply enlarged. At first, therefore, the difference is purely quantitative. We have shown that the surplus-value produced by a given capital is equal to the surplus-value produced by each workman multiplied by the number of workmen simultaneously employed. The number of workmen in itself does nor affect, either the rate of surplus-value, or the degree of exploitation of labour-power. If a working-day of 12 hours be embodied in six shillings, 1,200 such days will be embodied in 1,200 times 6 shillings. In one case 12 × 1,200 working-hours, and in the other 12 such hours are incorporated in the product. In the production of value a number of workmen rank merely as so many individual workmen; and it therefore makes no difference in the value produced whether the 1,200 men work separately, or united under the control of one capitalist. Nevertheless, within certain limits, a modification takes place. The labour realised in value, is labour of an average social quality; is consequently the expenditure of average labour-power. Any average magnitude, however, is merely the average of a number of separate magnitudes all of one kind, but differing as to quantity. In every industry, each individual labourer, be he Peter or Paul, differs from the average labourer. These individual differences, or “errors” as they are called in mathematics, compensate one another, and vanish, whenever a certain minimum number of workmen are employed together. The celebrated sophist and sycophant, Edmund Burke, goes so far as to make the following assertion, based on his practical observations as a farmer; viz., that “in so small a platoon” as that of five farm labourers, all individual differences in the labour vanish, and that consequently any given five adult farm labourers taken together, will in the same time do as much work as any other five. But, however that may be, it is clear, that the collective working-day of a large number of workmen simultaneously employed, divided by the number of these workmen, gives one day of average social labour. For example, let the working-day...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Invisible Value Creation
Whoever controls group coordination captures the exponential value that teamwork creates beyond individual contributions.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when collective effort creates extra value that gets captured by whoever controls the coordination.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when teamwork at your job creates results that exceed individual contributions - then track who gets credited and compensated for that success.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Cooperation
When workers combine their individual efforts under one employer to create something greater than the sum of their parts. Marx shows this isn't just people working near each other, but creating a collective force that multiplies productivity.
Modern Usage:
Think of a restaurant kitchen during dinner rush - each cook alone couldn't handle 200 orders, but working together they create a machine that serves hundreds.
Surplus-value
The extra value workers create beyond what they're paid for their labor. If you produce $100 worth of goods in a day but only get paid $50, that $50 difference is surplus-value that goes to your boss.
Modern Usage:
When your store makes $500 an hour but pays you $15, you're creating surplus-value that becomes the owner's profit.
Labor-power
Your ability to work - not the work itself, but your capacity to do it. Under capitalism, you sell this capacity to an employer for a set time period.
Modern Usage:
When you clock in at work, you're not selling specific tasks but your ability to work for eight hours however the boss needs.
Workshop system
The transition from individual craftsmen to groups of workers laboring together under one master. Marx sees this as the foundation of modern factory production.
Modern Usage:
Like how independent Uber drivers are being replaced by delivery companies that coordinate multiple drivers under one app.
Division of labor
Breaking down complex work into smaller, specialized tasks that different workers perform. This increases efficiency but makes each worker dependent on the others.
Modern Usage:
Assembly lines where one person installs doors, another seats, another engines - nobody builds the whole car anymore.
Capitalist production
An economic system where those who own the tools and workspace hire others to do the actual work, keeping the profits from what's produced.
Modern Usage:
Your manager doesn't make the product or serve the customers, but owns the business and takes home the profits from your labor.
Characters in This Chapter
The Capitalist
Central figure who employs workers
Owns the workplace and coordinates worker cooperation, but doesn't do the actual production. Gets the benefits of teamwork without contributing labor himself.
Modern Equivalent:
The franchise owner who never works shifts but profits from the crew's coordinated efforts
The Individual Workman
Single worker before cooperation
Represents the isolated laborer whose individual efforts are limited. Marx shows how this worker becomes more powerful when combined with others, but loses control over that power.
Modern Equivalent:
The gig worker who's more productive in a team but has to give up independence to join one
The Medieval Master Handicraftsman
Historical comparison point
Shows how the workshop system evolved from traditional craftsmanship. Unlike the capitalist, this master actually knew the trade and worked alongside apprentices.
Modern Equivalent:
The skilled contractor who still works with their crew versus the corporate owner who just manages
Key Quotes & Analysis
"A greater number of labourers working together, at the same time, in one place, in order to produce the same sort of commodity under the mastership of one capitalist, constitutes, both historically and logically, the starting-point of capitalist production."
Context: Marx is defining what makes capitalism different from earlier forms of work organization
This quote captures the essence of how capitalism transforms work from individual craft to collective production under private ownership. The key is that workers cooperate, but the capitalist controls and profits from that cooperation.
In Today's Words:
Capitalism really starts when a boss gets a bunch of people working together in one place to make the same thing, and keeps the profits.
"The number of workmen in itself does not affect, either the rate of surplus-value, or the degree of exploitation of labour-power."
Context: Explaining that simply having more workers doesn't automatically mean more exploitation per worker
Marx is making a crucial distinction - having 100 workers instead of 10 doesn't mean each worker is exploited ten times more. The rate of exploitation per worker can stay the same even as total profits increase.
In Today's Words:
Having more employees doesn't necessarily mean you're screwing over each one worse - you're just screwing over more people at the same rate.
"When numerous labourers work together side by side, whether in one and the same process, or in different but connected processes, they are said to co-operate, or to work in co-operation."
Context: Defining cooperation as a technical economic term, not just people being nice to each other
Marx distinguishes between casual teamwork and systematic cooperation that creates new productive power. This isn't about friendship - it's about how working together creates capabilities no individual possesses.
In Today's Words:
Real cooperation isn't just being friendly - it's when people working together can accomplish things none of them could do alone.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
The structural division between workers who create collective value and capitalists who capture it through ownership of coordination
Development
Deepens from earlier chapters by showing how class division operates through control of cooperation itself
In Your Life:
You might notice how management captures the value your team creates while paying you individually
Identity
In This Chapter
Workers lose individual identity when absorbed into the capitalist's organized production machine
Development
Builds on alienation themes by showing how cooperation itself becomes a tool of identity erasure
In Your Life:
You might feel like just a cog in the machine when your individual skills get absorbed into team processes
Power
In This Chapter
The capitalist's power comes not from individual ability but from controlling how others cooperate
Development
Expands power analysis to show it operates through coordination rather than just ownership
In Your Life:
You might recognize how supervisors gain power by controlling how your team works together
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Cooperation becomes a relationship mediated by capital rather than direct human connection
Development
Introduces how capitalism transforms natural human cooperation into a profit-generating mechanism
In Your Life:
You might notice how workplace teamwork feels different from family cooperation because someone else profits from it
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Marx say twelve people working together accomplish more than twelve people working separately, even for the same number of hours?
analysis • surface - 2
Who benefits when workers cooperate effectively, and why does this matter for understanding workplace dynamics?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your workplace or a group project you've been part of. Where do you see this pattern of collective effort creating extra value that gets captured by whoever controls the coordination?
application • medium - 4
If you understand that teamwork creates bonus value that often flows to coordinators, how would you position yourself differently in group situations?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the difference between creating value and capturing value in human relationships?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Cooperation Value
Think of a recent group effort you participated in - a work project, family event, volunteer activity, or community effort. Map out what each person contributed individually versus what the group accomplished together. Then identify who captured the extra value that cooperation created and how they positioned themselves to do so.
Consider:
- •Look for the gap between individual contributions and collective results
- •Notice who organized or coordinated the effort versus who did the work
- •Consider whether the extra value was shared fairly or concentrated
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt your teamwork created significant value but you didn't benefit proportionally. What would you do differently now to either capture more of that value or ensure it was shared more equitably?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 14: Division of Labor and Manufacture
Moving forward, we'll examine breaking work into specialized tasks changes both workers and workplaces, and understand factory organization creates different power dynamics than individual crafts. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.